From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratliff v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Nov 5, 2024
5:24-cv-00085-GCM-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00085-GCM-WCM

11-05-2024

TONYA RATLIFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

W. Carleton Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's renewed Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Motion,” Doc. 12). While Plaintiff has now submitted summaries of time spent on this case by both counsel and counsel's paralegal, that information does not include sufficient details for the Court to determine the reasonableness of the requested fees, such as the amount of time (in hours) claimed by each timekeeper as being compensable under the EAJA and the portion of the proposed fee award associated with that time (for each timekeeper).

Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ratliff v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Nov 5, 2024
5:24-cv-00085-GCM-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Ratliff v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:TONYA RATLIFF, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Nov 5, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-00085-GCM-WCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2024)