From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratliff v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Apr 1, 2015
Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143 (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143

04-01-2015

RANDALL ELMER RATLIFF, Petitioner, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Respondents.


FINAL ORDER

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Ratliff's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is DISMISSED without prejudice and this action shall be STRICKEN from the active docket of the court.

Further, finding that Ratliff has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to the petitioner.

Entered: April 1, 2015

/s/

Michael F. Urbanski

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ratliff v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
Apr 1, 2015
Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143 (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Ratliff v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL ELMER RATLIFF, Petitioner, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 1, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:15cv00143 (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2015)