From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rathod v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-161-P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-161-P

03-24-2020

RAKESHKUMAR RATHOD, Petitioner v. WILLIAM BARR, ET AL., Respondents


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 10), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition (ECF No. 1) and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 9) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 24th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rathod v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-161-P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Rathod v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:RAKESHKUMAR RATHOD, Petitioner v. WILLIAM BARR, ET AL., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 24, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-161-P (W.D. La. Mar. 24, 2020)