From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rasul v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-928 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-928.

October 30, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiff Ali Rasul, a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this "Motion for Order Permitting Prisoner to Attend Private Viewing of Deceased Relative." Plaintiff alleges that his mother passed away on October 21, 2009, and he requests permission to attend a private viewing at the funeral home.

Plaintiff incorrectly asserts that he is a pre-trial detainee. In fact, he was convicted of federal offenses and is serving concurrent sentences imposed by the Southern District of Texas in cause numbers 4:07-CR-36(7) and 4:08-CR-30(1). The website maintained by the Bureau of Prisons reflects that plaintiff's projected release date is October 31, 2010.

Discussion

A district court does not have the authority to order a prisoner's release for the purpose of attending a funeral or private viewing. See McMullen v. Hambrick, 1 F.3d 1241, 1993 WL 302197 (6th Cir. Aug. 6, 1993) (unpublished). Congress has vested the Bureau of Prisons with discretion to determine whether such a release is appropriate. The relevant statute provides, in part:

The Bureau of Prisons may release a prisoner from the place of his imprisonment for a limited period if such release appears to be consistent with the purpose for which the sentence was imposed and any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(a)(2), if such release otherwise appears to be consistent with the public interest and if there is reasonable cause to believe that a prisoner will honor the trust to be imposed in him, by authorizing him, under prescribed conditions, to —
(a) visit a designated place for a period not to exceed thirty days, and then return to the same or another facility, for the purpose of . . .
(2) attending a funeral of a relative . . .
18 U.S.C. § 3622(a)(2). In turn, the Bureau of Prisons has delegated the authority to approve such furloughs to the Warden or Acting Warden of the institution where the prisoner is confined. 28 C.F.R. § 570.32(a)(1).

Because the matter is entirely within the discretion of the Bureau of Prisons, a prisoner does not have a constitutionally-protected right to release for a funeral. Therefore, this court lacks the authority to grant plaintiff a temporary release.

Conclusion

This civil action should be dismissed. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Rasul v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 30, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-928 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Rasul v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ALI RASUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-928 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sorenson v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr.

Furthermore, Plaintiff's Equal Protection argument that he is being treated as a "class of one" fails because…