From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raspberry v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Sep 9, 2011
CASE NO.: 8:07-cv-658-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 8:07-cv-658-T-23MAP.

September 9, 2011


ORDER


An administrative law judge ("ALJ") found that Ruth Raspberry is not entitled to disability, disability insurance benefits, or supplemental security income from December 1, 1999, to September 3, 2001. Asserting that the ALJ erred, Raspberry sues (Doc. 1) the Commissioner of Social Security. On August 19, 2011, Magistrate Judge Pizzo issued a report (Doc. 26) finding that the ALJ's decision applies the correct legal standards and enjoys the support of substantial evidence.

The time Local Rule 6.02 allows for an objection expired and Raspberry submits nothing. Magistrate Judge Pizzo's report and recommendation is thorough and proper. Consequently, the report and recommendation (Doc. 26) is ADOPTED, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED, and Raspberry's action is DISMISSED. The clerk is directed to enter a judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, to terminate any pending motion, and to close the case.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Raspberry v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Sep 9, 2011
CASE NO.: 8:07-cv-658-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Raspberry v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RUTH RASPBERRY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 8:07-cv-658-T-23MAP (M.D. Fla. Sep. 9, 2011)