Rasp v. Superior/Reinhardt Ins. Co.

Full title: T. RASP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR/REINHARDT INSURANCE CO.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 30, 2001

17 F. App'x 703 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

17 Fed.Appx. 703 (9th Cir. 2001) T. RASP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR/REINHARDT INSURANCE CO., Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-56227. D.C. No. CV-00-603-NAJ/JAH. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 30, 2001

Submitted August 13, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding.

Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

T. Rasp appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We

Page 704.

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Virgin v. San Luis Obispo, 201 F.3d 1141, 1142 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam).

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered on June 1, 2000.

Rasp's remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.