Opinion
Case No.: 05 CV 0530 IEG (JMA).
September 21, 2005
ROY L. LANDERS, LAW OFFICES OF ROY L. LANDERS, San Diego, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Aneska Rasheed.
FLYNN FLYNN, Attorney for Defendant, Security Chevrolet, Inc.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel, that Security Chevrolet, Inc., and Does 1-10, Inclusive named as defendants in the above-captioned action, be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a) (1).
For valuable consideration, the undersigned Plaintiff fully and forever releases and discharges ALL DEFENDANTS from any and all actions, causes of action, claims, demands, costs, expenses and compensation by reason of any damages, general or special, or injury or injuries sustained by him on account of or in any way arising out of the incident described and set forth in the Complaint of Rasheed vs. Security Chevrolet., et al., filed on March 16, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 05 CV 0530 IEG (JMA).
SO STIPULATED.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES HAVE READ THE FOREGOING AND FULLY UNDERSTAND IT.