From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rash v. Stansberry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2011
460 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-7118

12-23-2011

CHARLES E. RASH, a/k/a Charles Emmanuel Rash, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Charles Emmanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00836-HEH)

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Emmanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Rash, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rash v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-00836-HEH (E.D. Va. July 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Rash v. Stansberry

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2011
460 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Rash v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. RASH, a/k/a Charles Emmanuel Rash, Petitioner - Appellant, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Citations

460 F. App'x 201 (4th Cir. 2011)