From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 4, 1926
152 N.E. 440 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued April 1, 1926

Decided May 4, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

Frank Gibbons for appellant.

John V. Maloney and Robert J. Summers for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the exclusion of the certificate of Dr. DeGroat as an admission of plaintiff was not prejudicial, and the exclusion of the evidence and record of Miss Nelson was proper as it appears that she was acting as the agent of the attending physician.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and LEHMAN, JJ. Absent: ANDREWS, J.


Summaries of

Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 4, 1926
152 N.E. 440 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Rarogiewicz v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Case Details

Full title:AMIELIA RAROGIEWICZ, Respondent, v. THE BROTHERHOOD OF AMERICAN YEOMEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 4, 1926

Citations

152 N.E. 440 (N.Y. 1926)
152 N.E. 440

Citing Cases

People v. Mirque

(See 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2382, at 834 [McNaughton rev] [privilege would apply to an unlicensed nurse "or…

People v. Mirque

On the other hand, it has long been settled that the health care professional's privilege does extend beyond…