From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raptis v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1961
13 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

May 11, 1961


Order entered on or about January 9, 1961, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for legal insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, in the exercise of discretion, to plaintiff-respondent to serve a further amended complaint. The allegations of breach of covenant are patently conclusory and, therefore, insufficient.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Raptis v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1961
13 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Raptis v. Grand Union Company

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE RAPTIS, Respondent, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)