From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rappaport v. Rose Robert Travel Bureau, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1987
129 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 13, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the plaintiff's time to commence an action in New Jersey for the same relief for which the defendants must accept service of process, is extended until 30 days after service upon her of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Trial Term properly exercised its discretion in granting the defendants' motion for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327. It is well established that the New York courts "need not entertain causes of action lacking a substantial nexus with New York" (Martin v Meith, 35 N.Y.2d 414, 418). Here, the plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey and was injured when she was struck by an automobile being driven by her husband, also a New Jersey resident. The accident occurred in the garage of their New Jersey home. The automobile was owned by a New York corporation, the defendant Rose Robert Travel Bureau, Inc., but was registered in New Jersey. A New Jersey police officer was called to the scene and investigated the circumstances surrounding the accident. Also responding to the scene were members of the local first aid squad, who took the plaintiff to a nearby New Jersey hospital where she was treated and released. Subsequently, the plaintiff underwent orthopedic surgery in New York, at which time she was also examined by a New York psychiatrist.

Taking into consideration all of the relevant factors (see, e.g., Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 N.Y.2d 474, cert denied 469 U.S. 1108), we agree with the determination that the cause of action does not bear a substantial connection with the State of New York, and should be adjudicated in New Jersey. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rappaport v. Rose Robert Travel Bureau, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1987
129 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Rappaport v. Rose Robert Travel Bureau, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE RAPPAPORT, Appellant, v. ROSE ROBERT TRAVEL BUREAU, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Sikinyi v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

In this case, the accident occurred in New Jersey, the decedent was a resident of New Jersey and, as a result…

Rivera v. Ford Motor Credit Company

The defendant Ford Motor Credit Company (hereinafter Ford Credit) appeals from the denial of its motion to…