From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rappaport v. Crawford

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Decided January 31st, 1927.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 669.

Messrs. Harcourt Steelman, for the respondents.

Messrs. Cole Cole, and Mr. John S. Westcott, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Rappaport v. Crawford

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Rappaport v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:DAVID N. RAPPAPORT et al., respondents, v. FRANK CRAWFORD et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1927

Citations

135 A. 919 (N.J. 1927)
135 A. 919

Citing Cases

State v. New Jersey Zinc Co.

He is generally entitled to the excess of the award above the purchase money. Rappoport v. Crawford, 99 N.J.…

N.J. Highway Authority v. J. F. Holding Co.

Conceivably the apportionment may implicate the security claims of mortgagees and other lienors, tax liens,…