From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rapid Machine Works, Inc., v. Silberstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 1, 1930
140 Misc. 30 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)

Opinion

December Term, 1930.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, New York County.

Samuel A. Hirshowitz, for the appellant.

Shepard Broad, for the respondent.



We think the stipulation of counsel should be construed to permit defendant to mitigate his damages in the conversion action by showing the return of the goods and their value at that time, as an offset to the damages prima facie established by proof of value at the time of conversion.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

LYDON and PETERS, JJ., concur; FRANKENTHALER, J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Rapid Machine Works, Inc., v. Silberstein

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 1, 1930
140 Misc. 30 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
Case details for

Rapid Machine Works, Inc., v. Silberstein

Case Details

Full title:RAPID MACHINE WORKS, INC., Appellant, v. MARCUS SILBERSTEIN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1930

Citations

140 Misc. 30 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
248 N.Y.S. 735

Citing Cases

Kapsemalis v. Taylor

First National Bank of Lawton et al. v. Thompson, 41 Okla. 88, 137 P. 668; Dunn v. Modern Foundry Machine…

American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.

We believe the New York rule to be that the plaintiff, in an action for conversion, can recover the…