From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raper v. Deen

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Apr 29, 2022
CIVIL 4:22-cv-4001 (W.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 4:22-cv-4001

04-29-2022

JAMES M. RAPER PLAINTIFF v. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY THOMAS DEEN, 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT


ORDER

SUSAN O. HICKEY, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed March 31, 2022, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 16. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice.

No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) in toto. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is warned that a dismissal of this case may be counted as a strike for purposes of 29 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. The Court certifies pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of April, 2022.


Summaries of

Raper v. Deen

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Apr 29, 2022
CIVIL 4:22-cv-4001 (W.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Raper v. Deen

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. RAPER PLAINTIFF v. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY THOMAS DEEN, 10th…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 29, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 4:22-cv-4001 (W.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2022)

Citing Cases

Raper v. Braylee

Defendant lists three of Plaintiff's cases which were dismissed and according to Defendant, strikes…