From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rapaport v. Flushing Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1999

November 1, 1999

Howard Rapaport, Bayside, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Vincent F. Nicolosi, Bayside, N.Y., for respondent.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, DAVID S. RITTER, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover the proceeds of a certificate of deposit, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated September 24, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(b) to set aside a determination of the same court, dated March 9, 1998, directing the entry of judgment in favor of him and against the defendant in the total sum of only $25,197.54.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(b) to set aside the determination directing the entry of judgment in his favor in the total sum of only $25,197.54 was untimely since it was made five months after the determination (see, CPLR 4405).

In light of the foregoing, the plaintiff's remaining contentions need not be addressed.

S. MILLER, J.P., O'BRIEN, RITTER, and ALTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rapaport v. Flushing Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1999
266 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Rapaport v. Flushing Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD RAPAPORT, appellant, v. FLUSHING SAVINGS BANK, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 496

Citing Cases

Inman v. Scarsdale Shopping Ctr. Assocs. LLC

In unusual circumstances, courts have extended the 15-day deadline where (1) the delay is brief and good…