From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ranz v. Yaschenko

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1946
329 Ill. App. 274 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Summary

In Ranz v. Yaschenko, 329 Ill. App. 274, 67 N.E.2d 891, the court dismissed a cross appeal on the basis that a judgment on a directed verdict on Count I of a two Count complaint from which there had been no appeal was a "definitive disposition of the issues in the negligence case."

Summary of this case from Suvada v. White Motor Co.

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,551. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 26, 1946 Released for publication August 19, 1946

INTOXICATING LIQUORS, § 120when finding as to cause of injury in dramshop action was not against manifest weight of evidence. In action alleging liability under Dram Shop Act for injuries sustained by plaintiff as result of accident on stairway of restaurant, where defendant contended that finding that plaintiff was injured as result of being pushed by intoxicated woman was against manifest weight of evidence, and it appeared that there was evidence that drinks served to such woman on premises contributed to her intoxication and that she pushed plaintiff while plaintiff was at top of stairway, which caused her to fall, held that judgment for plaintiff was properly entered.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOHN F. BOLTON, Judge, presiding.

Judgment affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the October term, 1945.

Lord, Bissell Kadyk, for appellants;

Leonard F. Martin and Edward S. Crowell, of counsel;

Errett O. Graham, for appellee;

Hinshaw Culbertson, for cross-appellee;

Oswell G. Treadway, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 26, 1946; released for publication August 19, 1946.


Summaries of

Ranz v. Yaschenko

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1946
329 Ill. App. 274 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

In Ranz v. Yaschenko, 329 Ill. App. 274, 67 N.E.2d 891, the court dismissed a cross appeal on the basis that a judgment on a directed verdict on Count I of a two Count complaint from which there had been no appeal was a "definitive disposition of the issues in the negligence case."

Summary of this case from Suvada v. White Motor Co.
Case details for

Ranz v. Yaschenko

Case Details

Full title:Lillian Ranz, Appellee, v. Col. W. W. Yaschenko and 181 East Lake Shore…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 26, 1946

Citations

329 Ill. App. 274 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
67 N.E.2d 891

Citing Cases

Bramblett v. State

The defendant offered the witnesses and he cannot complain if the district attorney asserts his right to…

Webber v. Webber

[1] The order dismissing the complaint for separate maintenance is not before us. It finally disposed of a…