Rantung v. Mukasey

1 Citing case

  1. Rantung v. Holder

    479 F. App'x 137 (9th Cir. 2012)

    Rantung's only argument is that his case should be remanded for the agency to assess his withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis. We reject Rantung's argument in light of our prior decision, Rantung v. Mukasey, No. 05-75377, 2008 WL 4155280 (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2008), in which this court applied the disfavored group analysis to Rantung's withholding of removal claim and rejected his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.