From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ranteesi v. Randy Grounds

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0439 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0439 GEB GGH P.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. This is petitioner's fifth request for the appointment of counsel, all prior requests have been denied. The claims in this petition are straight forward and not complex. Also, the petition is now fully briefed, so it is not clear how counsel would be appropriate at this stage in the case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's August 2, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied;

2. Petitioner's June 1, 2011, motion is vacated.

DATED: August 29, 2011


Summaries of

Ranteesi v. Randy Grounds

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0439 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Ranteesi v. Randy Grounds

Case Details

Full title:SIMON F. RANTEESI, Petitioner, v. RANDY GROUNDS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0439 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)