From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ransom v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC.

February 8, 2010


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER. (Doc. 211) PLAINTIFF DIRECTING TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. (Doc. 213)


This civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On July 29, 2009, Defendants filed a motion seeking to modify the scheduling order to allow them to file a second motion for summary judgment.

Good cause having been shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order to file a second motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, nunc pro tunc to October 29, 2009;
2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' October 29 motion for summary judgment within thirty days from the date of service of this order; and
3. If Plaintiff needs additional time to file a response, he shall file a motion seeking an extension of time prior to the expiration of the thirty day deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ransom v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Ransom v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN E. RANSOM, Plaintiff, v. M. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-00086-OWW-GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Rockemore v. Vasquez

See Ransom v. Johnson, No. 1:05-cv-00086 OWW GSA (PC), 2009 WL 1025587, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2009),…

Martinez v. Garsha

In part, the Court is concerned about any non-production of relevant documents on the ground that documents…