From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ransfer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Apr 28, 2020
604 S.W.3d 851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107745

04-28-2020

Christopher RANSFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kim C. Freter, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 1100, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 West High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Kim C. Freter, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 1100, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 West High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Ransfer appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ransfer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Apr 28, 2020
604 S.W.3d 851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Ransfer v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher RANSFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Apr 28, 2020

Citations

604 S.W.3d 851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)