From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankins v. Keller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 25, 2013
1:12-CV-177 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-CV-177

03-25-2013

MICHAEL RANKINS, Plaintiff, v. ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On February 27, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 3] was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. #5] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds they do not affect the validity of the reasoning of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 3] is affirmed and adopted in full.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation and which is accompanied by the $350.00 filing fee. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rankins v. Keller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 25, 2013
1:12-CV-177 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Rankins v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RANKINS, Plaintiff, v. ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

1:12-CV-177 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013)