From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankins v. John McGowan Working Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2018
No. 17-11372 (5th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-11372

07-24-2018

JAMES L. RANKINS III, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN MCGOWAN WORKING PARTNERS, INCORPORATED Defendant - Appellee


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
No. 4:17-CV-881 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Plaintiff James L. Rankins, III brought this pro se action against Defendant John McGowan Working Partners, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas, alleging that McGowan Working Partners committed unauthorized drilling for oil, gas, and minerals on several of Rankins' properties. Below, the district court ordered Rankins to file an amended complaint, as Rankins' initial complaint failed to "adequately allege diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332." Rankins did so, but once again, Rankins failed to allege "any facts to show the place of incorporation and principal place of business of" McGowan Working Partners. Accordingly, the district court dismissed Rankins' claims, and Rankins timely appeals.

"The burden of establishing federal jurisdiction rests on the party seeking the federal forum." For diversity jurisdiction then, "the party asserting federal jurisdiction must 'distinctly and affirmatively allege' the citizenship of the parties." "'Failure adequately to allege the basis for diversity jurisdiction mandates dismissal.'" Rankins fails to meet his burden, as he does not plead the citizenship, place of incorporation, or principle place of business of McGowan Working Partners. Rankins' opening brief does not address diversity jurisdiction, and the record is likewise deficient. The district court therefore properly dismissed Rankins' claims.

Howry v. Allstate Ins. Co., 243 F.3d 912, 919 (5th Cir. 2001).

Id. (quoting Stafford v. Mobil Oil Corp., 945 F.2d 803, 804 (5th Cir. 1991)) (brackets removed).

Id. (quoting Stafford, 945 F.2d 805). --------

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rankins v. John McGowan Working Partners, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 24, 2018
No. 17-11372 (5th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Rankins v. John McGowan Working Partners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. RANKINS III, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JOHN MCGOWAN WORKING…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 24, 2018

Citations

No. 17-11372 (5th Cir. Jul. 24, 2018)

Citing Cases

Rocha v. De La Garza

See id.; Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 377; Brand Servs., L.L.C. v. Irex Corp., 909 F.3d 151, 155 (5th Cir. 2018)…

Bey v. Dinello

Plaintiff “fails to meet his burden, as he does not plead the citizenship” of Defendant, and his “brief[ing]…