From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankine v. Levi Strauss & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 31, 2022
22-CV-3362 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3362 (VSB)

05-31-2022

PATRICK RANKINE, Plaintiff, v. LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff filed this action on April 25, 2022, (Doc. 1), and filed an affidavit of service on May 9, 2022, (Doc. 5). The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint was May 26, 2022. (See Doc. 5.) To date, Defendant has not appeared or responded to the complaint. Plaintiff, however, has taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, he is directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than June 7, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrate that he intends to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rankine v. Levi Strauss & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 31, 2022
22-CV-3362 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Rankine v. Levi Strauss & Co.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK RANKINE, Plaintiff, v. LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3362 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2022)