From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankine v. AMR Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 22, 2016
CASE NO.: SC15-2021 (Fla. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC15-2021

08-22-2016

BEVERLY RANKINE Petitioner(s) v. AMR CORPORATION, ET AL. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 1D15-2892; 12-011626GCC

Following no response to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated June 7, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the First District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded for reconsideration upon application of our decision Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S197 (Fla. Apr. 28, 2016).

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test: /s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court lc
Served: WILLIAM J. MCCABE
CLINTON LYONS
HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK
KEVIN R. GALLAGHER
HON. GERARDO CASTIELLO, JUDGE


Summaries of

Rankine v. AMR Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 22, 2016
CASE NO.: SC15-2021 (Fla. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Rankine v. AMR Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY RANKINE Petitioner(s) v. AMR CORPORATION, ET AL. Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: SC15-2021 (Fla. Aug. 22, 2016)