From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 27, 2005
216 S.W.3d 130 (Ark. 2005)

Opinion

No. CR 04-1188.

Opinion delivered October 27, 2005.

APPEAL ERROR — ADDENDUM INSUFFICIENT — REBRIEFING ORDERED. — Where neither the notice of appeal nor the petition for post-conviction relief or any amendments thereto were included in the addendum, the addendum was insufficient and re-briefing was ordered.

Durrett Coleman, by. Gerald A. Coleman, for appellant.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


[1] Appellant Roderick Leshun Rankin appeals the July 13, 2004 order of the Jefferson County Circuit Court, whereby he was denied any relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.5 (2005). However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the addendum. Likewise, the petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 37.5, and any amendments thereto, are not included in the addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the addendum is insufficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum. Dodson v. State, 357 Ark. 646, 187 S.W.3d 854 (2004). Under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court may affirm the judgment if an amended addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

DICKEY, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Rankin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 27, 2005
216 S.W.3d 130 (Ark. 2005)
Case details for

Rankin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roderick Leshun RANKIN v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 27, 2005

Citations

216 S.W.3d 130 (Ark. 2005)
216 S.W.3d 130