From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District
Feb 4, 1974
506 S.W.2d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 26665.

February 4, 1974.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, JACKSON COUNTY, JAMES MOORE, J.

Bruce W. Simon, Kansas City, for appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Robert Presson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DIXON, C. J., and SHANGLER and WASSERSTROM, JJ.


This is an appeal from an order entered in a 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceeding overruling the motion and denying the movant an evidentiary hearing. The sole point on appeal asserts that petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed, after an unsuccessful direct appeal, to proceed by certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. This ground was not set forth in the 27.26 motion, although appointed counsel had advised movant that his motion could be amended to include this claim. The issue presented is governed by the holding in Fritz v. State, 449 S.W.2d 174 (Mo. 1970). An opinion in this case would have no precedential value.

The trial court judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16.


Summaries of

Rankin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District
Feb 4, 1974
506 S.W.2d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Rankin v. State

Case Details

Full title:FINIS S. RANKIN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District

Date published: Feb 4, 1974

Citations

506 S.W.2d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)