From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rankin v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2150-P (W.D. La. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2150-P

06-25-2012

GARY RANKIN v. WARDEN N. BURL CAIN


JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Petitioner and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioners complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The Court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 25th day of June, 2012.

______________________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rankin v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2150-P (W.D. La. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Rankin v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:GARY RANKIN v. WARDEN N. BURL CAIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2150-P (W.D. La. Jun. 25, 2012)