From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 18, 1988
532 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-167.

October 18, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County; Richard J. Fowler, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the guidelines without providing written reasons. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); e.g., Foster v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Dougfield v. State, 529 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Contra Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (en banc). See also Brumley v. State, 520 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1988); Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987); Harris v. State, 520 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Rangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 18, 1988
532 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Rangel v. State

Case Details

Full title:VICENTE RANGEL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 18, 1988

Citations

532 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Pope v. State

s are in disarray on the issue of the proper instruction to be given the trial court when a cause is remanded…

Pope v. State

After Jackson, when a trial court failed to provide written reasons, some district courts remanded for…