From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of Cal., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2016
Case No. CV 16-6119-DMG (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-6119-DMG (SSx)

11-17-2016

PEARL RANGEL, Plaintiff, v. PLS CHECK CASHERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 16], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc. and against Plaintiff Pearl Rangel. DATED: November 17, 2016

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of Cal., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2016
Case No. CV 16-6119-DMG (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of Cal., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PEARL RANGEL, Plaintiff, v. PLS CHECK CASHERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 16-6119-DMG (SSx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2016)

Citing Cases

Estorga v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Auth.

Id. Because § 216(b) and other statutory authority did not support plaintiffs' argument, the appellate court…

Estorga v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Auth.

Id. Because § 216(b) and other statutory authority did not support plaintiffs' argument, the appellate court…