From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. Mehta

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2009
No. CIV S-02-1633 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1633 GEB EFB P.

November 16, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his November 3, 2009 Status Report, plaintiff indicates that he intends to file and serve a Second Amended Complaint naming Dr. Nabil Athanassious, the California Medical Facility, and the California Attorney General as defendants.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the status conference set for November 18, 2009 is VACATED, and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. Upon screening the Second Amended Complaint, the court will order service of the complaint as it deems appropriate.


Summaries of

Rangel v. Mehta

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2009
No. CIV S-02-1633 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Rangel v. Mehta

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO HAMILTON RANGEL, Plaintiff, v. DR. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 16, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1633 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2009)