From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2273 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2273 KJM EFB P

02-21-2012

RICARDO RANGEL, Petitioner, v. BRENDA CASH, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's February 6, 2012, request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

_________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Rangel v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2273 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Rangel v. Cash

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO RANGEL, Petitioner, v. BRENDA CASH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2273 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2012)