From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rangel-Hernandez v. Thompson

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jan 4, 2023
Civil Action M-22-CV-179 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action M-22-CV-179 CRIMINAL ACTION M-12-CR-874-2

01-04-2023

JOSE GUADALPUE RANGEL-HERNANDEZ v. WARDEN PAUL THOMPSON,


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Randy Crane, Chief United States District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Movant's construed motion for reconsideration as to the issuance of a certificate of appealability (“COA”). After having reviewed the said Report and Recommendation, and no objections having been filed by either party, the Court is of the opinion that the conclusions in said Report and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the conclusions in United States Magistrate Judge J. Scott Hacker's Report and Recommendation entered as Docket Entry No. 18 are hereby adopted by this Court.

FURTHER, the Court, having adopted the Magistrate Judge's conclusions, is of the opinion that the motion for reconsideration should be DENIED and that no COA be issued. The Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Request for Evidentiary Hearing [Dkt. No. 19] is hereby DENIED.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the parties.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rangel-Hernandez v. Thompson

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jan 4, 2023
Civil Action M-22-CV-179 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Rangel-Hernandez v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:JOSE GUADALPUE RANGEL-HERNANDEZ v. WARDEN PAUL THOMPSON,

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

Civil Action M-22-CV-179 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2023)