From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Range Co. v. Cozart

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
24 S.E. 356 (N.C. 1896)

Opinion

(February Term, 1896.)

Shepherd Busbee and A. A. Hicks for plaintiff.

W. A. Guthrie for defendant.


This case is governed by the opinion in the above case against Carver. But it does not appear that any claim for county tax is involved; and as the defendant was restrained and enjoined by the order below from collecting the State tax imposed by (343) section 28, chapter 116, Laws 1895, the order was erroneous and should not have been granted. There is error, and the judgment is

Reversed.


Summaries of

Range Co. v. Cozart

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
24 S.E. 356 (N.C. 1896)
Case details for

Range Co. v. Cozart

Case Details

Full title:WROUGHT IRON RANGE COMPANY v. W. S. COZART

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1896

Citations

24 S.E. 356 (N.C. 1896)
118 N.C. 342