From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randonich v. Sisto

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 15, 2008
No. C 07-3730 RMW (PR), (Docket Nos. 8, 11) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 07-3730 RMW (PR), (Docket Nos. 8, 11).

August 15, 2008


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, petitioner has filed an opposition, and respondent has filed a reply. Good cause appearing, petitioner's request for an extension of time (Docket No. 11) in which to file the opposition, to and including August 30, 2008, is GRANTED. Petitioner's opposition, filed August 8, 2008, is timely. Petitioner's request for default judgment (Docket No. 8) is DENIED, as respondent was granted an extension of time to answer the petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Randonich v. Sisto

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 15, 2008
No. C 07-3730 RMW (PR), (Docket Nos. 8, 11) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Randonich v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:DONALD EUGENE RANDONICH, Petitioner, v. D.K SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2008

Citations

No. C 07-3730 RMW (PR), (Docket Nos. 8, 11) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2008)