From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Univ. of Kan. Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 8, 2021
Case No. 20-2600-JAR-TJJ (D. Kan. Jan. 8, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 20-2600-JAR-TJJ

01-08-2021

LATREISSA D. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, USMAN LATIF, M.D., AND JOHN M. SOJKA, M.D., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed on December 9, 2020 (Doc. 7). Fourteen days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that in accordance with the December 9, 2020 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7), this case is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2021

S/ Julie A. Robinson

JULIE A. ROBINSON

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Randolph v. Univ. of Kan. Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 8, 2021
Case No. 20-2600-JAR-TJJ (D. Kan. Jan. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Randolph v. Univ. of Kan. Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:LATREISSA D. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jan 8, 2021

Citations

Case No. 20-2600-JAR-TJJ (D. Kan. Jan. 8, 2021)