From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Smithsonian Inst.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 18, 2013
521 F. App'x 927 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-3106

07-18-2013

KATRINA A. RANDOLPH, Petitioner, v. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC315H120325-I-1.

Before DYK, PROST and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The court considers whether to dismiss Katrina A. Randolph's petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Randolph's representative received the Merit Systems Protection Board's decision in her case on February 22, 2013. Her petition was initially received by the court on April 25, 2013.

A petition for review of an MSPB decision must be filed "within 60 days after the Board issues notice" of its decision. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A). This filing period is "statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional." Monzo v. Dep't of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984).

Here, Randolph was required to file her petition by April 23, 2013, two days before it was received. Her petition is therefore untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A) ("filing is not timely unless the clerk receives the papers within the time fixed for filing"). Accordingly, the court lacks jurisdiction to consider Randolph's petition and must dismiss it.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

__________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk


Summaries of

Randolph v. Smithsonian Inst.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 18, 2013
521 F. App'x 927 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Randolph v. Smithsonian Inst.

Case Details

Full title:KATRINA A. RANDOLPH, Petitioner, v. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Respondent.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 18, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 927 (Fed. Cir. 2013)