From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. McFadden

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 8, 2022
Civil 3:21-cv-00651-MR (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2022)

Opinion

Civil 3:21-cv-00651-MR

02-08-2022

CHARLES B. RANDOLPH, Petitioner, v. GARY L. MCFADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.

The pro se Petitioner filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 while he was incarcerated at the Mecklenburg County Jail. [Doc. 1]. A recent mailing to Petitioner from the Court was returned as undeliverable, stamped “Return to Sender ... Unable to Forward, ” and “Not in Mecklenburg County Jail System.” [Doc. 5 at 1].

It appears that the Petitioner's address has changed, and that he has not filed a Notice of Change of Address with this Court. It therefore appears that the Petitioner may have abandoned this action.

The Petitioner shall, within ten (10) days of this Order, update his address of record and inform the Court whether he intends to proceed with this action. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice and this case's closure without further notice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Petitioner shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order in which to update his address of record and inform the Court whether he intends to proceed with this action. If the Petitioner fails to do so, this case will be dismissed without prejudice and closed without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Randolph v. McFadden

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 8, 2022
Civil 3:21-cv-00651-MR (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Randolph v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES B. RANDOLPH, Petitioner, v. GARY L. MCFADDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2022

Citations

Civil 3:21-cv-00651-MR (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2022)