Opinion
9:19-CV-1161
11-30-2021
EDWARD RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. LISA KALIES et al., Defendants.
EDWARD RANDOLPH HON. LETITIA JAMES DAVID C. WHITE, ESQ.
EDWARD RANDOLPH
HON. LETITIA JAMES
DAVID C. WHITE, ESQ.
ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
DAVID N. HURD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 19, 2019, pro se plaintiff Edward Randolph (“plaintiff”), an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and 1 Community Supervision (“DOCCS”), filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs while he was incarcerated at Auburn Correctional Facility. Dkt. No. 1. After discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims. Dkt. No. 62.
On November 10, 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks advised by Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and plaintiffs complaint be dismissed. Dkt. No. 79. Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time period in which to do so has expired. See Id. Upon review for clear error, the R&R will be accepted and adopted in all respects. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Report & Recommendation is ACCEPTED; and
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 2