From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Henry

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. 03-CV-5232 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. 03-CV-5232 ALA HC.

November 16, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner Tanesha E. Randolph is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On August 21, 2007, Petitioner was ordered to show cause as to why this petition should not be dismissed for failure to allege a constitutional violation. That order was returned to this court on September 10, 2007 as undeliverable. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rules 83-182(f), and 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997), which require that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner is ordered to show cause within 14 days as to why this action should not be dismissed for Petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of her current address.


Summaries of

Randolph v. Henry

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. 03-CV-5232 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Randolph v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:TANESHA E. RANDOLPH, Petitioner, v. GLORIA A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

No. 03-CV-5232 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)