From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Harter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 30, 2018
No. 18-1548 (4th Cir. Jul. 30, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1548

07-30-2018

ROBERT LEE RANDOLPH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEE HARTER; CATHAY HUGHES, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert Lee Randolph, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00689-TMC) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Randolph, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Randolph appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Harter, No. 5:18-cv-00689-TMC (D.S.C. May 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Randolph v. Harter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 30, 2018
No. 18-1548 (4th Cir. Jul. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Randolph v. Harter

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE RANDOLPH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEE HARTER; CATHAY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 30, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1548 (4th Cir. Jul. 30, 2018)