From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randle v. Teixeira

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:19-cv-02615-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02615-TLN-JDP (PC)

12-29-2021

JAMES WESLEY RANDLE, Plaintiff, v. A. TEIXEIRA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY MERITS-BASED DISCOVERY AND MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER ECF NOS. 32, 40, 42, & 45

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed two motions for extensions of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 40 & 42. Good causing appearing, plaintiffs motions are granted, and his opposition, ECF No. 43, is deemed timely.

Defendants have filed two motions that collectively ask the court to stay merits-based discovery and to vacate the scheduling order's discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. ECF Nos. 32 & 45. Defendants' motions are granted, and all deadlines in the April 27, 2021 scheduling order are vacated. Those deadlines will be reset, if necessary, following resolution of defendants' motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Randle v. Teixeira

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 29, 2021
2:19-cv-02615-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Randle v. Teixeira

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WESLEY RANDLE, Plaintiff, v. A. TEIXEIRA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-02615-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)