From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randle v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 23, 2012
No. 10-11-00117-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-11-00117-CR

08-23-2012

BRADFORD RANDLE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 35109CR


ABATEMENT ORDER

Randle has complained of the trial court's failure to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.22, section 6. These findings are mandatory even if the defendant did not request them at trial. See Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Therefore, we will abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court for the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. The trial court's written findings shall be forwarded to the Clerk in a supplemental clerk's record within thirty days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Proceeding abated
Order issued and filed August 23, 2012
Do not publish


Summaries of

Randle v. State

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Aug 23, 2012
No. 10-11-00117-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Randle v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRADFORD RANDLE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

No. 10-11-00117-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)