rejecting argument that Nevada conviction does not becomes final until after resolution of direct appeal claims on appeal pursuant to Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944
Summary of this case from Sanders v. WilliamsNo. 10–5897.
10-12-2010
Patrick H. RANDLE, petitioner, v. Howard SKOLNIK, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
rejecting argument that Nevada conviction does not becomes final until after resolution of direct appeal claims on appeal pursuant to Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944
Summary of this case from Sanders v. Williamsrejecting petitioner's contention that counsel's failure to file direct appeal constituted extraordinary circumstances entitling him to equitable tolling
Summary of this case from Jones v. BakerFull title:PATRICK H. RANDLE v. SKOLNIK, DIR., NV DOC, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 12, 2010
The Ninth Circuit has held that, where a Nevada petitioner has pursued a Lozada petition, the date of the…
Valerio v. ScilliaIn Jiminez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113, 119-121 (2009), the United States Supreme Court concluded that, if a…