From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randle v. Rule 38, Canon 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2018
4:18-CV-00529-BRW (E.D. Ark. Aug. 22, 2018)

Opinion

4:18-CV-00529-BRW

08-22-2018

LEODIS RANDLE PLAINTIFF v. RULE 38, CANON 3 DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Based on the order entered today, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2018.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Randle v. Rule 38, Canon 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2018
4:18-CV-00529-BRW (E.D. Ark. Aug. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Randle v. Rule 38, Canon 3

Case Details

Full title:LEODIS RANDLE PLAINTIFF v. RULE 38, CANON 3 DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2018

Citations

4:18-CV-00529-BRW (E.D. Ark. Aug. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Randle v. Doe

Randle is a "three-striker" within the meaning of the PLRA. Randle has had at least four 42 U.S.C. § 1983…