From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randisi v. Household Finance Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1945
269 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

November 16, 1945.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. ( Reich v. Railroad Employees' Personal Loan Co., 291 N.Y. 714.)


In our opinion, section 358 Banking of the Banking Law does not purport to declare a loan void merely because a statement furnished pursuant to section 353, by inadvertent error incorrectly states the date of maturity.

The error herein was clearly inadvertent, and the order should be reversed, the complaint dismissed and defendant Household Finance Corporation awarded judgment in the consolidated action.

Martin, P.J., Townley and Dore, JJ., concur in decision; Cohn and Callahan, JJ., dissent in opinion.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. ( Reich v. Railroad Employees' Personal Loan Co., 291 N.Y. 714.)


Summaries of

Randisi v. Household Finance Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1945
269 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Randisi v. Household Finance Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS RANDISI et al., Respondents, v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Consumers Credit Corp. of Miss. v. Stanford

generally held that where the Small Loan Regulatory Act provides that the violation of the Act is a…

Credit Finance Service v. Able

We base our decision on the considerations already stated and also on the following grounds: Bailey v.…