From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2018
No. 72218 (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2018)

Opinion

No. 72218

02-13-2018

TIMOTHY RANDELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Timothy Randell appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon, sexual assault with the use of a deadly weapon causing substantial bodily harm, sexual assault with the use of a deadly weapon, first-degree kidnapping with the use of a deadly weapon, and robbery with the use of a deadly weapon. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Patrick Flanagan, Judge.

Randell claims the district court abused its discretion at sentencing when it only considered punishment and not other factors when sentencing him to the maximum possible sentence including life in prison without the possibility of parole. The district court has wide discretion in its sentencing decision. See Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). We will not interfere with the sentence imposed by the district court "[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence." Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976).

Randell was sentenced to serve a total of three consecutive terms of life without the possibility of parole plus other various consecutive sentences. --------

Randell does not argue the district court relied on information or accusations supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence. Further, the district court considered many factors when sentencing Randell. The district court specifically stated it considered his childhood, his mental health history, previous attempts at punishment, his youth, his criminal history, the victims, the crimes, and the goals of punishment. After considering these factors, the district court concluded it would sentence Randell to the maximum sentence. Given these facts, we conclude Randell failed to demonstrate the district court abused its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Chief Judge, Second Judicial District Court

Second Judicial District Court, Dept. 7

Washoe County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Randell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2018
No. 72218 (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Randell v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY RANDELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2018

Citations

No. 72218 (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2018)