From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randazzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 12, 1992
597 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-1539.

May 6, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 12, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed. As to the issue regarding double jeopardy, the factual predicate for the prior convictions for dealing in stolen property and grand theft involved different conduct at different times than the armed robbery and first degree murder conviction which are the subject of this appeal. See United States v. Felix, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1377, 118 L.Ed.2d 25 (1992); McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1991). Regarding appellant's claim of lack of notice of the state's intent to proceed on a felony murder theory where the indictment charged premeditated murder, see Young v. State, 579 So.2d 721 (Fla. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1198, 117 L.Ed.2d 438 (1992). As to the contention that the court erred in submitting a general verdict, see Haliburton v. State, 561 So.2d 248, 250 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2910, 115 L.Ed.2d 1073 (1991). Finally, we find that any error in the introduction of hearsay testimony was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Randazzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 12, 1992
597 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Randazzo v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY RANDAZZO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 12, 1992

Citations

597 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)