From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. Village of Long Beach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

April, 1919.


Judgment and order of the County Court of Nassau county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict to the sum of $312.50, the pro rata amount of the annual compensation agreed upon for three and one-half months, and to modify the judgment accordingly; in which case the judgment, as so modified, and the order are unanimously affirmed, without costs. We think that the institution by the plaintiff of the taxpayer's action against the village was an act inconsistent with the performance of his services as counsel to the village; therefore, his right to recover is limited to the period intervening the date of his employment and the date of his suit. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Randall v. Village of Long Beach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Randall v. Village of Long Beach

Case Details

Full title:C. WALTER RANDALL, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF LONG BEACH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)