Opinion
Argued March 14, 1892
Decided March 25, 1892
John Brooks Leavitt for appellants.
Samuel H. Randall respondent in person.
GRAY, J., reads for reversal.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Argued March 14, 1892
Decided March 25, 1892
John Brooks Leavitt for appellants.
Samuel H. Randall respondent in person.
GRAY, J., reads for reversal.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Full title:SAMUEL H. RANDALL, Respondent, v . JACOB H. SHERMAN et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 25, 1892
The fact that plaintiff reduced his demand against the city to the form of a claim, consisting of various…
Russell v. McDonald( Lewis v. Snook, 88 App. Div. 343; Clinch v. Henck, 49 id. 183; Richards v. Stokes 1 id. 305.) Numerous…