Opinion
Argued May 4, 1893
Decided June 6, 1893
G.H. Beckwith for appellant.
Louis W. Pratt for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Randall v. National Ice Company of New York
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1893
34 N.E. 280 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Randall v. National Ice Company of New York
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1893
34 N.E. 280 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Randall v. National Ice Company of New York
Case Details
Full title:LORETTA H. RANDALL, Respondent, v . THE NATIONAL ICE COMPANY of New York…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 6, 1893
Citations
34 N.E. 280 (N.Y. 1893)
138 N.Y. 644
53 N.Y. St. Rptr. 930
Citing Cases
Levino v. Moore Co.
We are clearly of opinion that the defendant was bound to pay for the excess of labels or to surrender the…
Inman v. L.E. White Lumber Co.Appellant could have declined, of course, to receive any number in excess of 20,000, but after accepting and…